top of page

Part 3: Feedback at work – constructive or harsh?

6 days ago
2 min read

"You have to do this differently next time."


For some, this is a completely normal and clear response.


For others, the sentence may be perceived as harsh, negative, or demotivating.


Why do we react so differently?


Generations have grown up with different expectations of the workplace. Many older workers are used to the idea that the workplace is primarily about getting the job done. If you get a message, you do what needs to be done.


Praise doesn't have to come every time.


For many younger workers, feedback is a bigger part of the daily work environment. They want to know what they are doing well, what they can improve, and how they can develop.


Neither is necessarily wrong.


But communication can crash.

A leader might think:

"I gave a clear message."


The employee may think:

"I only got criticism."


Similarly, a manager who gives a lot of positive feedback may find that an older employee thinks:

“Why am I being praised for doing my job?”


This is where the so-called "praise sandwich" comes in: first something positive, then criticism or points for improvement, and finally something positive again.


It may work well for some. For others, it may feel artificial.

The most important thing is therefore not to find one perfect method.

The most important thing is to make expectations clear .


Instead of:

"This was bad."


can one say:


"This didn't work the way we need it to. Let's look at what we can do differently next time."


Instead of:

"You need to toughen up."


can one say:

“I expect this to be done this way going forward.”


Then we criticize the action – not the person.


A good response should ideally answer three questions:

What happened?

Why is it a problem?

What do we want to happen next time?


And one more question:

How can I help you make it happen?

Then the feedback becomes a tool for development, not just a judgment.


The opposite also applies. Younger employees may benefit from understanding that a direct message does not necessarily mean that the boss is unhappy with them as a person.


"This needs to be improved" can actually mean exactly that:


This can be improved.

Not:


You are bad.


The generation gap arises when we confuse the message and the feeling the message gives us .


Therefore, we should become better at asking questions before we draw conclusions.

“Do you think I should change this, or are you dissatisfied with my job in general?”


Such a question can save both employee and manager from many misunderstandings.

Because good feedback is not about being kind or strict.

It's about being clear, respectful, and helpful .

Comments


bottom of page